Listen: everything published before a certain date? WAS inherently bound up in The Establishment, because The Establishment *is literally what decided who was allowed to have a voice in the first fucking place*. The Canon didn't just APPEAR out of thin, culturally neutral air!
-
-
- which might sometimes put them in *conversation* with The Canon, but not always! Or if that link can be made, it doesn't have to be intentional! Readers can pick up on links between texts that authors never think of. That's part of the magic of analysis, fandom & interpretation
Show this thread -
-
Jumping back on to add that, in listing all the things which impacted who was allowed to join The Canon (or even write at all) prior to a certain date, we need to be conscious that the bias within publishing hasn't magically gone away. For all that diversity is flourishing -
Show this thread -
- it's thanks to active pushback and monumental acts of will, most often by marginalised creators, who expend their time and energy making space for themselves and their peers within an industry that often, still, tries to push them out.
Show this thread -
(For an example of such bias, we need look no further than Cluess saying a WOC doesn't deserve her job as a teacher for daring to question The Canon and probe it for racism - a statement she then tries to gloss over by claiming Calm And Rational Concern For Literature
)Show this thread -
Like far too many industries, publishing is very one step forward, two steps back when it comes to diversifying, which is why we can't rest on the non-existent laurels of Modern Publishing Is Fixed Now You Guys, Bias Only Happened In Ye Olden Dayes.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.