like I get it!! I get that you want there to be Rules about Stuff to Avoid Being Problematic Forever!! but nuance and context still exist!! and leaning on the existence of Rules to Avoid Thinking About Specifics Because They Can Be Difficult is reductive and often bad, actually!!
-
-
Show this thread
-
not to be married to a philosopher on main but I am literally begging some of you to look up the No True Scotsman fallacy and apply it to the concept of People From The Same Marginalisation Can Disagree About Things Without Invalidating Said Marginalisation
Show this thread -
I swear to god, one day I'm gonna wake up and there'll be "writing in English is Angelocentric and therefore Bad uwu" discourse on the timeline and on that day I will yeet myself into the ocean to live with the whales
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Ah, those Sterling Archer moments. Yeah. If I had ever learned to drink, I think Twitter might've turned me into an alcoholic by now.
-
There is only one true Sterling Archer moment:pic.twitter.com/g7geyTK64Y
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is exactly my reaction at some of the Discourse swirling on my tl today. Thought of engaging, decided to take a walk instead
-
Same. *passes around bourbon*
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You are the best.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I spent too long there wondering what a bourbon four was.
-
It's better than a bourbon three
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.