A personal anecdote relevant to this point: at a previous temp job, I was responsible for helping to organise the interviews to find my eventual full-time replacement, and one of the interview questions was about the candidate's experiences with diversity. (brief thread)https://twitter.com/ZerlinaMaxwell/status/1084843917181370368 …
-
-
Merely existing as a diverse person in a workspace is not considered as noble or good as being an ally who champions such people, or who can mouth lip-service about having done so in an interview whose questions are framed to best advantage such answers.
Show this thread -
Particularly for low-level jobs like this one was , the question itself becomes a kind of reverse dogwhistle derived from org-wide box-checking: at best, they're asking if the candidate is an obvious bigot, and at worst, they're gatekeeping for your knowledge of jargon -
Show this thread -
- which, again ironically, is much more likely to trip up marginalised candidates for whom English is a second language, who have less formal education, who are new to officework, or who come from lower-class backgrounds.
Show this thread -
In this way, asking candidates about their commitment to diversity becomes a purely performative act: a way for interviewers to put the burden of proving diversity on candidates so that they don't have to question their own assumptions and biases about who "fits the job".
Show this thread -
When I had this realisation at the time, I expressed it to my (white, straight) manager in the context of how diverse the candidates had been. She looked briefly appalled, and noted that they'd hired one of the only two white, native English speakers.
Show this thread -
This isn't to say the person they hired wasn't competent - I wasn't privy to the interviews themselves, so I can't speak to that aspect of things. I also think it's important that my manager acknowledged the problem once I pointed it out, however belatedly.
Show this thread -
But, yeah: we need to collectively rethink those 'commitment to diversity' questions, because in so many contexts, they're premised on diversity as something the candidate should *encourage* but not *possess*, which is antithetical to the desired outcome. FIN
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.