Dude, "whiteness" is not an ethnic heritage; it's a skintone. Being German or Dutch or Sami is heritage, and European POC can claim that, too; trying to "preserve whiteness" is a racist dogwhistle used by people afraid of miscegenation because they believe in white supremacy.https://twitter.com/karkas132/status/1000950149185589248 …
-
-
Replying to @fozmeadows
Okay, lets try to find some even footing here than. So say a German person of color talks about being proud of being black or middle eastern etc, and encourages how their fellow POC should only date/procreate with fellow POC's, is this black/arabian/asian etc supremacy?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @karkas132
Foz Meadows Retweeted Foz Meadows
Foz Meadows added,
Foz Meadows @fozmeadowsWhite ppl "preserving [white] culture" pretty much IS Nazism, dude. Whiteness is a skin colour, NOT a culture; only racists conflate the two. Black culture is black culture because slavery, racism & diaspora stripped away other cultural heritage; whiteness exists WITHIN culture. https://twitter.com/GythjaDawn/status/1000934244825300994 …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
So basically what you are saying, is that if POC do the same thing that you are complaining about 'white' people doing, its not equivalent to racism or acts towards supremacy? That is a ridiculous double standard.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @karkas132
No; what I'm saying is that there's a contextual difference between people who've been robbed of their heritage & murdered for their skin forming a new cultural identity around celebrating the blackness that saw them enslaved, and white people arguing that whiteness needs saving.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
Thats still a double standard, I have absolutely 0 issue with black people or asians or arabians or what have you being proud of their heritage that lead to them having the skin tone that they have but implying that its wrong for whites to do the same is well quite frankly racist
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @karkas132
And there's where you're making your error: their pride is in their CULTURE, not their skin, whereas white pride in white skin is irrevocably founded on white supremacist ideas.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
and you claim that there are not any cultures inherently attached to white skin but there are cultures inherently attached to others? I would venture to say that German Culture, Anglo Culture, French Culture, and Scandinavian Culture are inherently linked to their traditional
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @karkas132
Black pride in diaspora groups developed specifically because slavery tore away all other cultural markers. But beyond that, you are very, very wrong about your views of Anglo/German/French/Scandinavian history and race.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
How so? The traditional ethnic populations of these nations have all been white and there is no historical or anthropological evidence to suggest otherwise.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
That is flat-out wrong. Literally, profoundly wrong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sami_history …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.