-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@foundersfund To what extent is "population-growth deceleration" a viable/desirable component of such a strategy? Solves the algebra problem -
.
@zdch Population control isn't viable or desirable b/c it requires draconian exertion of force. It's clear what we need: more energy. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@foundersfund One non-dogmatic answer is reducing number of people to zero. Then, the goal gets logically satisfied. -
.
@michelteivel Let's rephrase: how do we get there without an apocalypse? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
.
@foundersfund France did it on a national scale,@Transatomic will do it on the global scalepic.twitter.com/LDl1wjP0HF
-
@markmassie@foundersfund@transatomic Wish they'd build one here instead of the same old stupid expensive waste producing plants.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@foundersfund Really only one way, nuclear fission. Here is a back of the envelope calculation http://statisticaleconomics.org/2014/01/24/power-for-the-people-a-cryptographic-and-nuclear-renaissance/ …@markmassieThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@foundersfund One reason, the volumetric energy density of fusion fuel is worse that conventional liquid fossil fuels.@markmassieThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.