Conversation

Just moving the goal posts---the same applies everywhere. You cited a number that didn't even take into account diameter. Obviously you aren't an engineer or care about these topics seriously. It is just Elon fanboyism for you.
1
1
not moving goal posts. if you put elon's tunnel size (12.5) on that graph, it's literally still cheaper! Thanks for proving my point
Image
1
1
The estimated minimum cost for 12 m^2 is about a million dollars according to that chart. His tunnel is entirely comparable to the average cost to build a tunnel like that. The y-axis is in cost per METER, so yeah NICE ONE.
1
2
And if you can push 57k people per hour FOR A CHEAPER TUNNEL ($0 TAX DOLLARS), THEN YOU GOT A CHEAPER SUBWAY why is this so hard for you to figure out
Image
3
1
This is nonsense---you repeatedly use data like this. Basically cheery pick things without ever looking at them holistically. It is completely dishonest to represent rail this way---and you do it while speaking about how people dishonestly speak about EVs.
Image
1
1
that data is nonsense. considering global EV marketshare is <5%, your data includes cars that aren't as safe as Teslas. and it includes drunk drivers, intersection crashes, and many other causes of car crashes that you won't see in tunnels. you're the one being dishonest.
Image
2
So your claim is that EVs in tunnels are 30 times safer than cars on streets? I could grant you probably a few times safer, but 30 times seems completely unjustified and out of the range of what is actually possible. Humans will be driving these cars after all.
1