Conversation

I think about this all the time. For me, the answer is no, across all mediums, and I chalk it up to diluted DNA a la Multiplicity. Everything great that can be accomplished by -organic humans- has already been done.
2
1
Ooh, what a viewpoint - is there then an implication about greatness to be achieved by non-organic humans to come? (though, of course, what could we say about that yet haha)
1
1
Rest assured—this isn’t the viewpoint I -want- to hold. I look for genius in art everyday because I long for the thrill. As far as AI—I don’t feel intrigued, hopeful, or curious even. Feeling a deep nostalgia for analogue art forms and inspired humanity. What do you think?
1
1
I also definitely feel what you said about the longing for analogue art forms and inspiration—I'm unsure whether it's simply an anxiety about the novelty, or if it's a genuine signal about the difference in quality between the 'Lindy' stuff and the products of modernity.
1
Replying to
Totally agree. The democratization of art through the removal of traditional gatekeepers has allowed a proliferation of work but watered down the quality—a double-edged sword for sure. We’re on the wavelength here. Let’s given on it and put something together.
1
1