Felix Holzmeister

@flxhlzmstr

PostDoc | Experimental and Behavioral Economics and Finance

Vrijeme pridruživanja: siječanj 2016.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @flxhlzmstr

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @flxhlzmstr

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. sij

    "A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science" a lovely (and beautiful) graphic of 12 things to watch out for when assessing scientific findings by . Excellent for journalists, teaching, public, and as a daily reminder for researchers. h/t

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    14. pro 2019.

    "We need to be cautious about what we claim. The incentives push toward making big claims, but good science probably means slowing down and exercising more caution."

    Poništi
  3. 4. pro 2019.

    The latter finding indicates that communicating risk between clients and professionals constitutes a potential pitfall in delegated investment decisions. (7/7)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. 4. pro 2019.

    Finally, we observe high variability among professionals' perception of delegated risk levels and overlaps in portfolio risk across self-reported risk-levels of clients. (6/n)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 4. pro 2019.

    We further show that - in our sample - decision-making quality of finance professionals is not significantly higher compared to their clients' when controlling for risk taking. (5/n)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 4. pro 2019.

    We find that clients' trust in money managers increases the likelihood of delegating their investment decisions, whereas decision-making quality is associated with a decrease in delegation rates. (4/n)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 4. pro 2019.

    We examine drivers of clients' delegation decisions, differences in decision-making quality between both groups, and professionals' ability to implement investment portfolios that suit the clients' risk attitudes. (3/n)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 4. pro 2019.

    Our study is based on an online experiment with 408 finance professionals and 550 subjects from the general population in Sweden. (2/n)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 4. pro 2019.

    New preprint on : Delegated Decision-Making in Finance (joint with Martin Holmén, Michael Kirchler, Matthias Stefan, and ) (1/n)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. stu 2019.

    Not the main argument in here but one that I think is good to highlight - We should never assume what we're doing in research is inherently useful or good. It's always possible that the best thing we could do is collectively take our balls and go home.

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    15. stu 2019.

    Ever wondered what would happen if 70 different groups analyzed the same fMRI dataset? The pre-print of our project is out ! 1/9

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    22. ruj 2019.

    What happens to the paper after peer review

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    19. ruj 2019.

    New suggests that journal impact factor isn’t a great proxy for paper quality, with these figures showing associations of JIF and replication index (left) and stats errors (right)

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    8. ruj 2019.

    The Perfect TED Talk that Never Happened.

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    This week & next, our participants predict the overall replication rates in SCORE. We are 1 part of SCORE. SCORE also funds the replications, a "rival" crowd forecasting team, and (TBD) machine learning. Happy to be part!

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    One day until until Replication Markets open! Did you know? Results from our project will train machine learning models to predict the validity of future research studies. Register by 6pm EDT (22:00 UTC) August 11! Video credit: guillellano on GIPHY

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Know the difference between useful and wrong? Help us evaluate claims in the social and behavioral sciences.

    Poništi
  20. 5. kol 2019.

    Nice paper using a neat task to pin down overprecision!

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·