Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @fluxus_txt

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @fluxus_txt

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    15. ruj 2018.

    this is my space to talk more and listen less

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. 15. sij

    WHEN I HAVE ENOUGH KNOWLEDGE I GOTTA TRY HORARY

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. 15. sij

    MYERS-BRIGGS/DOOMER MEMES/WHATEVER IS NOT "ASTROLOGY FOR XYZ" ASTROLOGY IS FAR MORE THAN A "WHICH CONSTELLATION ARE YOU" GIMMICKY PERSONALITY QUIZ

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. 15. sij

    HATE WHEN NORMIES TALK ABOUT ASTROLOGY BECAUSE THEY THINK IT'S ALL JUST SUN SIGNS

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 15. sij

    ASTROLOGY IS WAY MORE COMPLICATED (AND USEFUL) THAN NEWSPAPER HOROSCOPES MAKE IT SEEM

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 15. sij

    YOU AREN'T A "LIBRA" KAREN YOU'RE ALL TWELVE SIGNS ALTHOUGH NOT IN EQUAL PROPORTION

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 5. sij

    This “Magic: the Gathering” card fascinates me

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 5. sij

    The Divine is both “light”/beautiful and “dark”/terrifying and such an aesthetic should reflect that without unbalancedly obsessing with one or the other

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 5. sij

    Demonolatry seems to attract more balanced people than Satanism while broadly venerating the same beings, perhaps I could develop an aesthetic for it...

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 5. sij

    Christianity is morally bad but aesthetically good. It is aesthetically better than Satanism, unfortunately.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 5. sij

    Christianity is traumatic.

    Poništi
  12. 5. sij

    But rejoice artist, for your finished work is not less than your vision of it - but other! Self-expression not only of the conscious mind but a plurality of machines!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 5. sij

    Implicit, unrecognized desires form the piece too - say, a horny and hyperreligious author finding excuses to write about naked women - which shouldn’t be laughed at by the way they have to work through that somehow

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 5. sij

    Authors are mortals, not omnipotent gods, and their involuntary mistakes form the piece as much as their explicit desires.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 5. sij

    This is why the author is dead - those aspects of a work which are according to the author’s intent and those which arose by accident on the author’s part can not be cleanly separated.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 5. sij

    Variance of the piece from the artist’s intent does not straightforwardly REMOVE that aspect of the piece but rather changes it

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 5. sij

    (but not all artists have a Their Vision and know what they want, also)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 5. sij

    For some, artistic creation is a zero-sum game. The artist attempts to create a piece which conforms to Their Vision and each deviation from Their Vision is registered as loss

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 5. sij

    Not tailoring my tweets to comprehensibility or relevance to larger discourse is nice as fuck. I basically Keffiepost here cometothinkofit

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 5. sij

    I could stay here for a while

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. 5. sij

    Process-flaws are productive (8::7)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·