Tara’s charge was likely from a check that bounced, but that doesn’t mean it immediately triggered the charges. The check would have had to bounce twice (once if account was closed) and then Tara would have not complied with the diversion program. credit KingScoville on reddit
-
-
Show this thread
-
New conversation -
-
-
So you're saying there was no case filed? If so, explain this.pic.twitter.com/b8osMSwMKu
-
No I’m not saying that, I’m saying that it’s not as simple as Tara wrote a bad check and was immediately charged with a misdemeanor
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Interesting. Do we know if this would result in termination from a Senate office if they found out? Also how would Biden's Senate office find out. Electronic records were not as prevalent then?
-
Banks can call your office.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
And that is her home town the timing of the charges however...maybe some contacted the Senate Office to try to get in contact with her?
-
Employment verification
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@threadreaderapp please unroll. thx -
Halo! you can read it here:
@FliedGaff: So San Luis Obispo county has had a bad check program since 1989. The victim must try to cash a check twice… https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1258800115831107584.html … Share this if you think it's interesting.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.