![[Redacted]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/887889700790435844/8BxpfQkR_normal.jpg)
Can't say why that is. Have never seen that pattern before.
The date in the microdots is 6:20 2017/05/09 from a printer with serial number #5429535218, according to https://w2.eff.org/Privacy/printers/docucolor/ …pic.twitter.com/6BY7Y3MFhL
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
How do leakers avoid measures like these, spacing signifiers, etc?
-
Maybe we're looking at publishers having to re-type documents and re-draw graphics.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
So the whitewashing happens with the publisher, not the leaker, so being reputable as a safe publisher is everything. Makes sense.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
great point
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There's also a few character-space breadcrumbs in the document. Wow. This leaker wasn't careful at all.pic.twitter.com/9usYecqEKk
-
I wonder if anyone has used font kerning watermarks?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I do not understand the graphic. Can somebody explain it, please?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You can see the dots easier if you invert the colors (like with the PaintBrush program built into macOS)pic.twitter.com/G6Bp1ofRhg
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.