Been thinking a lot about what comes after “free software” & “open source.” Both terms were coined when the tech industry (& the world) was a very different place. I think we’ve outgrown them.
-
Show this thread
-
Early thoughts: both concepts are too code-centric and too license-oriented. Many things that we think of as indispensable to modern open source projects are not included in the formal definitions. This is a good sign that we have another, as-yet-unnamed concept in play.
4 replies 13 retweets 128 likesShow this thread -
Things not included in either concept include: - community building - accepting contributions from other people - ethical use of software - distribution mechanisms - governance - use of paid vs free labor
10 replies 31 retweets 266 likesShow this thread -
And many more - I’ve made a whole huge list. Perhaps I will even
BLOG
12 replies 0 retweets 164 likesShow this thread -
Open source & free software licenses were designed to correct the power imbalance that existed 30 years ago - when large companies selling proprietary software held power over their users. “Take this software for free!” the licenses said. “Fix it yourself if something breaks.”
5 replies 4 retweets 52 likesShow this thread
I wonder how much the “right to repair” concept should come into play for the users of the software.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

Trans pal, crafter, and board gamer. Coding on tiny computers and also at