Yes, Sellars's attack on the Given is definitely *not* his original contribution to philosophy -- and he was completely aware of following Peirce and Dewey here.
-
-
-
The interesting thing for me in this passage is Dewey taking habit as what is responsible for making a sensation intelligible. I know there are non-intellectualist readings of Sellars, but I'm not sure whether he'd go so far in the "ground floor of receptive coping" as Dewey did.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Lovely! I think I just found the epigraph to the concluding chapter of my PhD. Thanks for that
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.