You're advocating calling 4 year old children "defiant" because of their personality?
-
-
You entirely misunderstood context/use of "defy."When politely disagreed with, you started a battle.pic.twitter.com/DYmYyqV0f5
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @4th_WaveNow
I started a conversation on something I feel is important. It's sad that disagreement and genuine concern are disregarded as
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ShagMeFrida
@FightUnreality 2. But instead of agreeing to disagree, you chose divisive thought policing. Most importantly,4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @4th_WaveNow
You are trying to literally replace the use of GNC with "gender defiant" in the overall conversation on Trans ideology. That
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ShagMeFrida
@FightUnreality You can agree to disagree. That's the adult thing to do. Not hurl outrageous accusations of 'harming children.'2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @4th_WaveNow @ShagMeFrida
Ad hominem attacks & straw man fallacies =/= productive critique. Wearing down or silencing =/= winning argument
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @FightUnreality @4th_WaveNow
attack was intended. I forget that Twitter is a war zone and everyone needs to always have their defenses up.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ShagMeFrida @FightUnreality
You deliberately drew others in who thrive on attacking good ppl who are actually trying to change things.
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @4th_WaveNow @FightUnreality
person is trying desperately to use that experience to keep it from happening to others.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Do you understand that people with same motivation and similar experience can arrive at different conclusions?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.