.You are forgetting the exponential element in this.pic.twitter.com/Z9I1nykhx6
U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
No, this number does not apply to Wuhan as far as I can see. And be aware that worldwide the daily traffic death toll is currently 3.562 (severely injured a 20-fold of that) and still growing.
What's wrong w urbanist discourse that keeps ppl making such stunningly dumb comparisons? All other valid questions aside (ethics exponential growth deaths from public transit ban &c.) not even the numbers fit. Surely 129 deaths in Wuhan are more than 35 (=5 deaths*7 days)? JFCpic.twitter.com/iRnWDvI7VC
Food for thought?
Air pollution is a global health emergency, it has killed millions many more than these weird virii
REMINDER:
If all life on earth was ended today. There would be no deaths AT ALL in the future. #bigthought
Bad take.
One for you @N565UA
18.2 deaths per 100k n China in 2018. Interestingly, this is also precisely the number for the entire world. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_traffic-related_death_rate …
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.