The more I think about this, the more important it seems. JUSTICE, not FREEDOM, is what I want from software. Freedom could be a means, but is not the end.https://twitter.com/lizthegrey/status/1172926347603259392 …
-
-
The "Do No Evil" license causes problems though because there's no legal definition, and people don't self apply the term evil all that often. The ambiguity makes it a really bad license. I'm not bashing the idea though, just this implementation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"What constitutes evil" is an open question in all aspects of human social life - subject to courts, legislation, and private sanction. We won't be able to write a license and be done with it. A commitment to doing good is a commitment to continuous engagement with one another.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would want something broad enough that the license doesn’t have to name specifics yet specific enough that it can’t be widely misinterpreted. I think there are legal definitions of the word “harm,” so maybe that’s enough. As a creator of OSS, I’m interested in this discussion.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm inclined to include accumulation of informational advantage under evil, as well as business models predicated on information arbitrage.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
(
)(

)(
)(
)(
)(
)(
)(

)=
(



