Actually it benefits whoever the female deems as a good genetic partner to continue her line. Circumstances have changed because of recent technological advances, so we don't need to kill each other to breed. Whatever the female deems worthy now varies between lots of factors.
-
-
Replying to @cresent_blest
Yes, it benefits the females that would not have been chosen by the alpha males.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ferofax
LOL. Who are these god's gifts to womankind "alpha" males and what characteristics define them. Because that would be debatable depending on "when" you are. It could've been the strongest hunter, the leader of the pack, chieftains, etc. In this day and age some women would still
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cresent_blest @ferofax
prefer the more physically capable, but that could've also evolved to whichever male could be deemed more capable for child upbringing (good career, more nurturing, etc.) At one point this could've been Atilla the Hun, or Kublai Khan. The goal of the "Alpha" male was to bring
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cresent_blest @ferofax
As many progeny into the world. So monogamy wouldn't come into play here. They would keep fucking as many females as possible to bear their children.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cresent_blest @ferofax
Of course, that is no longer the goal today. A lot of people don't want children anymore. And a lot of the "alpha" males topping their fields don't want to father as many children as possible, that would be ruinous in this day and age. But the need to fuck is still there
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cresent_blest @ferofax
But either case, I really fucking doubt "monogamy benefits the females not chosen by the alpha" because LOL. Yeah, we're past the huns attacking villages and pillaging the women for child rearing.pic.twitter.com/CwNIj7BcVQ
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cresent_blest
Basically, monogamy locks down the male to one woman. Without it, most men will have no woman, some men will have a lot of women, but no women will have a man for their own. They will always have to share the man with everybody else under his protection.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ferofax @cresent_blest
And basically that's why I said my initial opinion. Without monogamy, a lot of women will never have a man of their own.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ferofax
Lol. Sorry but this is the most incel statement I've heard as of late. "Monogamy is a thing, so that's why the beta females are capturing one dude, otherwise all dudes would sleep around" Nevermind that most of the time the man decides to propose, and consciously doesn't cheat.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Incel is a new word to me, lol. Involuntary celibate. Sounds extremely sad. Reminds me how lonely a lot of people today are. But that's another matter, I guess.
-
-
Replying to @ferofax
haha they had a subreddit before but it got shut down recently cause it was toxic and rapey af. I don't know how to begin explaining cause I think reddit deleted everything when they purged it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cresent_blest
Good riddance then. But I'm not surprised. People who get pushed aside tend to get angry, regardless of whether or not they are right.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Sun,
Rising, Cusp of POWER