Take your age and add 5. That's your age in 5 years!
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wow that actually works. But wouldn't the number of significant figures of x depend on that of π?
-
The logarithm is irrational, yes. This is essentially saying "if you raise pi to a power that makes it a rational number, you get a rational number".
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
In base pi, pi=10.
-
Underrated tweet
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Too much work. I just multiply by zero when I want to make pi rational.
-
Multiplying by zero is not allowed in parallel universe
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's pretty obvious property of logarithms. What's interesting that Leibniz and Euler realized that one can use i, ln and -1 to represent πpic.twitter.com/M0RGuscbUY
-
Lurking subtlety: ln is by nature multi-valued. (2n+1)π also works as a logarithm of -1 for any integral value of n.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In other news, water is wet
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.