Light years?
-
-
-
Gigaparsecs, Planck lengths, whatever you like, it makes no difference
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
To the people asking about units: Let's say the number is in centimeters, and you want to convert to gigaparsecs. The conversion is: 2^10^119 * (Gpc/cm) = 2^10^119 * 3e27 = 2^10^119 * 2^91 = 2^(10^119 + 91) ≈ 2^10^119. So it's the same number in any reasonable length unit.
-
Yup... You can look at it that way: it's so far that whether you're flying one-way or getting a return ticket is mathematically insignificant...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is in units of "visible universe diameters" which is roughly 40 billion light years. It's a little bit more complicated, because the universe is expanding, so depending on how fast you go, the distance changes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's amazing, that's the same combination I have on my luggage!
-
Takes you a hell of a long time to get in there, but I suppose the extra security is worth it?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Distance in what units? Or is that a stupid question?
-
Not a stupid question, but it wouldn't matter. You could use the smallest or largest unit of measurement we have, and due to rounding, the number would not change. It's that big.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Roger Penrose's number is bigger 10^10¹²⁴. It describes unlikeliness of the Universe as we find it. His key point: the number at the top is the one that's all important.pic.twitter.com/tz7P0a0NbI
-
Isn’t Graham’s number even bigger still?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.