The claims are unlear from the article. Each of them should be discussed before jumping to conclusions. Uranium mining is a unhealthy process. Is that accounted for? This kind of science is not mathematics but politics.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@OperadorNuclear muy interesanteThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nuclear waste is a problem in the US only because certain people want it to be a problem. And 140 thousands tons of waste for decades of energy production is incredibly small quantity, especially since spent fuel is very dense and thus takes up very little space.
-
Perhaps burying it in underground coal mines...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Entwhistle Bitumen (1742-1796) made a similar study of mortality and use of logwood and dried peat in Scotland. He found that both fuel sources were very safe though some deaths from peat gathering were reported.pic.twitter.com/YDZohCersJ
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A data curve about IRAQ is missing in the diagram between 1991 - 2003
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mortality without quality of life is a poor metric. It's like an unnormalized probability function.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
According to anti-nuclear activists which have spent decades blocking any attempts to reprocess nuclear waste and store it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.