Ans:Not possible Reason: In integer sequence Every 3rd number is a multiple of 3, Every 2nd number is multiple of 2, pᵖ is neither of these since p is not a multiple of 2 and 3, exception p=3(29 case). Hence pᵖ+2 is always multiple of 3. Thank you!
-
-
-
5^5+2=3127 which is not a multiple of 3
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
No. I have discovered a wonderful demonstration of this proposition which, however, does not fit the margins of this tweet.
-
lol...280 characters and all the threads are still small I guess.pic.twitter.com/QxBraswBsx
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The next number after 3 that satisfies this condition is 7399777499266334886627748888197634589922266747888859595992827161263748894555667929382010484747291010193765446289028374747596070215554849207649294847272927474829292948575336899202837364792928474472901056663282725384020766578
-
Lol nice try. I thought about verifying that for a second but it's obviously not even prime.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Running a python program reveals that 3 is the only solution to this problem (at least 100,000 digits)pic.twitter.com/AWnYYP3DAz
-
Uneffiecent ( O(n^2) complexity) because of nested for loops. Try something like that, it will calculate until 10000000 (10 million) fast enough. But the result is still 3.pic.twitter.com/NTQ7yTQ1AZ
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
1 is not prime
- 4 more replies
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.