Not p^2. It should be p.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It should be "p = r^2 + s^2" (not "p^2 = ...")
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A Pythagorean Prime, in other words. That means 50% of the primes.
-
Also, that should be p, not p^2... I think
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
How does this relate to Pythagorean triplets? e.g. 5,12,13. 13 is 1mod4.
-
The picture should read p = r^2 + s^2, so the corresponding right triangle side lenghts are (√p, r, s). As √p is never an integer, these are not pythagorean triplets. Still, they are called pythagoream primes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_prime …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No. Because of the if and only if statement at the end. Primes can only be congruent to 1mod4 and 3mod4.
-
No sorry, i realized we were talking about two diffrent things, ofc you are right.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Teorema de Bezout BAYBEEE (kinda)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
on a letter to Mersenne dated 25 Dec 1640.
Here's a one sentence proof by D. Zagier:
