How did Euler disprove it?
-
-
-
He proved that F5 = 641 x 6 700 417.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Fermat conjectures something that Euler disproves" feels like the most mathsy maths thing that's ever happened in maths.
-
Sorry.... "the most mathy math thing that's ever happened in math" for the Other Side of the Pond.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wish Euler were immortal!
-
Do you want all mathematicians to loose their jobs or something, Euler got research done at a legendary scale, that even now is impossible for most mathematicians, if he was immortal, most of us would be jobless

End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We can say with certainty that a^(2n+1) + b^(2n+1) is always COMPOSITE for a,+b >1 and < -1
@gab -
fyi
@gabrielanthonyp my computer needs some better AI !!! - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
But can we prove that there exist infinite prime numbers of this form?
-
No one has any clue about that problem, but you're welcome to try
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.