Thank you for your generous sharing!!
I am glad I didn't miss this great piece. Thank you again. 
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What should we make of the motion of a particle in QM? Is it sprightly? Or more passively buffeted by its sprightly environment? Is this coupling inseparable? Are we limited by our mathematical analysis? How do we improve objectivity?
-
Were the creators of Quantum Mechanics trying to capture whimsy mathematically? Was their focus on particles too narrow? http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/whimsy
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.