@femfreq thank you for saying this. @Zennistrad is a good person.
-
-
-
Tweet unavailable
-
@renatasafad not justin! block.@femfreq@Zennistrad
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@femfreq So what you're saying is, you engaged in ACTUAL ethics by making sure to not get the wrong person blamed? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@femfreq Thanks for correcting. It seems a certain "consumer revolt" is getting aggravated at name-and-shame email releases. -
Tweet unavailable
-
@renatasafad@femfreq I'm not interested in hearing "you need a thicker skin" from the movement throwing a tantrum over "gamers are over" :) - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@femfreq your strength gives me strength. -
Tweet unavailable
-
@renatasafad@femfreq I'm sure that they do. That doesn't change the truth of what I said.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@femfreq Thank you :)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@femfreq these people... If you look at that message and think an unredacted IP is the problem, then YOU are the problem -
@hpjefwithonef@femfreq Why is that if you don't mind me asking? -
@art_eric Pretty sure we should worry more about the vagina flayer than an unredacted IP -
@hpjefwithonef I would definitely agree if I thought the threat was real. I sincerely doubt this psycho makes good on his ridiculous claim. -
@art_eric So if it's not real, what's the problem with not redacting the IP? I mean, if no one is seriously going to be hurt. -
@hpjefwithonef I also agree with that but then what's the point of posting it if it's not a real threat? -
-
@hpjefwithonef No offense but I think nobody would take this threat seriously. And if it isn't then posting the IP is done without reason. - 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.