-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@femfreq Can we all take a second to agree, it's horrifying that someone USED threats against women to further a political end? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@femfreq@verge I counter that article with this video from the Factual Feminist: http://youtu.be/Rm8nBt9rQBoThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
@Calvin_xc1@femfreq@verge a hoax and threat are the same exact thing. -
@Calvin_xc1@femfreq@verge you're likely never going to be aware of how capable or intentional someone is about carrying out what they say. -
@brittanystoroz@femfreq@verge So you don't care if the end goal was a publicity stunt or actual harm, you only care about the methods? -
@Calvin_xc1 scary position like that is an ok thing for someone to do? -
@brittanystoroz I'm objecting to conflating a glorified marketing stunt with actual violent acts. -
@Calvin_xc1 Until it was exposed as a glorified marketing act…it was a threat to carry out a violent act. -
@brittanystoroz Which puts it on par with other violent acts, what makes it a women's issue? - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@NielsIvarD@femfreq@verge do you not think that company's decision to target Watson deserves to be discussed? -
Tweet unavailable
-
@NielsIvarD@femfreq@verge really? You think that the threat to Watson and the threat to a website were equivalent? - 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.