Kelly Sommers
@felixgallo @samuelgmartinez Agree with you there :) But who’s in position to make the changes? Can the community fix it itself?
-
@felixgallo@antirez@samuelgmartinez I'm sorry but "relaxed CP" is made up and not accurate.
felixgallo
@kellabyte @antirez @samuelgmartinez sorry you don't understand the tradeoff. I do, and it's not great. But it exists.
-
-
@aphyr@kellabyte@antirez don't wat me bro, I don't like the feature and won't use it. But I understand it, flawed as it is. -
@felixgallo@kellabyte@antirez The tradeoffs asserted in that thread are flat-out lies; how can you consider them "well defined"? -
@aphyr@kellabyte@antirez 'flat out lies' is a pretty serious accusation. Sure you mean that? -
@felixgallo@kellabyte@antirez Yes. None of the proposed WAIT+failover strategies satisfy the claim of opt-in linearizability. -
@felixgallo@kellabyte@antirez If you're confident you "understand the tradeoffs", perhaps you'd be up for a little wager? ;-) -
@aphyr@kellabyte@antirez I have a counterproposal. How about I donate $150 to the LGBT/disadvantaged developer charity of your choice. -
@aphyr@kellabyte@antirez you spend 30 minutes writing a non-shirty, comprehensible explanation for salvatore for why his idea won't work. - View other replies
- Show more
-
-
-
@felixgallo@kellabyte@antirez@samuelgmartinez I am honestly interested in hearing what exactly this well-defined tradeoff is, though. - View other replies
-
@justinsheehy@felixgallo@kellabyte@samuelgmartinez but what you end with, is not totally inconsistent, not totally vulnerable to part. - View other replies
-
@antirez@felixgallo@justinsheehy@samuelgmartinez When you make a mess of the trade-offs the system is unpredictable & hard to use. - View other replies
-
@kellabyte so no real help, but thanks for the effort. - View other replies
-
@antirez this is all in an effort to make a better redis (which was the intent of your google groups thread, correct?) //@kellabyte - View other replies
-
@antirez you already know redis so you can jump right to impl;@kellabyte and others don't, so they're trying to frame intent before impl - View other replies
-
-
-
@felixgallo@kellabyte If you relax consistency, you can't say you're 'CP'. And that's ok! "Relaxed CP" is a bad phrase for it tho. - View other replies
-
@felixgallo@kellabyte C/A/P isn't really helping: suggest formalising consistency model and describing that instead. - View other replies
-
@henryr@felixgallo +1. Making a trade-off is fine and design the rest of the system around that trade-off. Embrace it in the design!
-
-
-
@felixgallo@kellabyte@antirez and learn to say NO. We are all free to fork it and do what we want. But never try to be what you’re not -
@samuelgmartinez@antirez@felixgallo Yup. Don't make a system that's extremely nuances and easy to misuse. Shut the door :)
-
Arf Installation
Justin Sheehy
Salvatore Sanfilippo
Eoin Coffey
Henry Robinson
Samuel García
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.