That's a really tricky one. There are lots of conflicting opinions on Shakespeare, but I can't think of any *unpopular* ones. I mean, in some of the sillier circles, saying he actually wrote the plays would be unpopular!
-
-
-
Yes, as soon as I said it I realised I didn't have anything in particular. It's not an unpopular view to say that some of his plays are put on too much or that King John is a neglected classic.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Intentionally or not, his plays are monarchist and politically conservative.
-
small c conservative (all politics are screwed so better negotiate the imperfections you know with tolerance/wit/self awareness), for sure. but monarchist?
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
“Shakespeare” is an artificial 18C construction that ignores the collaborative, intertextual theatre history that generated it.
-
The Baaaaaaaaard oh god
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Sondheim is at least as good.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Love's Labour's Lost is only good in performance.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Falstaff gets on my nerves.
-
He can depending on how he's played.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.