Trying to understand politics -- in particular geopolitics -- without studying history is like starting to read a 50-volume novel series at chapter 24 from book 18. You're just not going to be able to make sense of it, much less get a feel for where it might be going
-
-
Or like seeing infinity war as a single movie
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's exactly a fractal of how to use a machine learning model. Learning from past data to forecast the future. I would add the bagging statistics concept, so we don't learn only from 1-book, but from many of them! The "truth" may yield in their average: (
+
+
)/3 =
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yup. History is the why of political geography.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But if history is written by the victor, how can we really trust its validity? Wouldn't studying history be like studying a fairy tale, steeped in dogma and bias? It'll be like reading Harry Potter in order to become the great wizard.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As William Faulkner said, "The past is never dead. Its not even past"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
L'sigmoid.. ?
- Show replies
-
-
-
Trying to understand politics-without an awareness of the relations of man with his kind & nature -defined as historical class struggle- is like "learning with Python" using the wrong platform or data-set
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Psychohistory
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.