It may make you sound Very Important in 2018, but it *will* sound pretty ridiculous in 100 years. Let's treat AI as science and engineering, not as some kind of mystical art.
-
-
Show this thread
-
If you can sketch out what an AGI would be, how it would work, & what would make it dangerous -- the way a physicist might have sketched out the A-bomb in the early 1930s -- I'll worry about it. Until then, I'll worry about the actual, describable risks of ML applications
Show this thread -
Which are plenty, are largely absent from the public debate, in large part because of PR campaigns to make sci-fi scenarios that are profoundly disconnected from reality sound believable and scary. That discrepancy and the fear-mongering around AI are worrying in their own right
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
i wonder if they'll make an anime out of this
-
I would pay to see a charged GAN attack (it's going to be a thing ) against the evil twin
@badfellow_ian
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You think so? You could hardly think of a more prominent early 20th century physicist than Albert Einstein. His letter to Roosevelt is well known (he was arguing FOR, not AGAINST, the bomb).
End of conversation
-
-
-
If there is even a 5% chance that AGI will destroy humanity, then Elon is right to sound the alarm loudly -- no one was listening before.
-
I believe Humanity will have a much larger problem before we get to THAT! Keep doing what you're doing I'm learning from your tweets and heading to the books thanks
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
machine learning -- actually parametric optimization -- will solve everything --des imbeciles du XXIeme siecle
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.