You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
If thousands of researchers dedicate their efforts to making incremental improvements to a given technique, it's bound to progress and succeed (within its fundamental limits). But you could have seen similar progress if the same resources had been invested in a different paradigm
I think science moves faster when many different approaches are competing, not when everyone agrees on what works best.
It's a pity so many of science's institutions are designed to pick winners, rather than pick hedged portfolios.
also perverse incentivies around grants often channel people towards research with high propability of payoff not high risk. Same issue in VC. As such portfolio model will have similar issues.
Integarte Keras into Sci-kit when?
if everyone agrees on a approach, its well understood, then in my opinion they are now doing engineering ;-) Nothing wrong with engineering though
Exploration vs exploitation. Sounds familiar.
Here there is a high cost on the first exploration :P So you better start by exploitation and if that's working, no need to explore haha
Scientific research’s reward function is generating papers.
Diversification of minds = more chances of finding something interesting/different.
Maybe connectomics will show us a different way. Neuroscience leading the AI revolution.
Everyone involved is human. Everyone likes to confirm their dearly held beliefs.
Ties back to the core issue, too. A better approach to AI will reflect this dynamic clearly and in a simple fashion. And the proponents of less capable approaches don’t want to hear that. :-)
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
