In the long run, AI will be most transformative in domains where it will augment, rather than replace, human intelligence -- scientific research, education/personal growth, and media/entertainment
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I bet it’d be much less a debate and more so a phenomenally productive conversation
End of conversation
-
-
-
Or ending a life with a system that ended millions of lives, right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This presupposes a "seer" in the system somehow. Where is this viewpoint the system has? It is not spatiotemporally located like human consciousness - yet where and when is the sight of the full scope of human knowledge? Is this the view from nowhere?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's absurd, you're talking nonsense.
-
You're a sickening propagandist for something dangerous to human beings.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But imagine playing Go with the assistance of AlphaZero. You would be best to defer every move to its judgement. Why won’t all AI be like this eventually?
-
What is the point of humans in that scenario?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Replace "AI" with "computers" and you could be saying the same in the 80s.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well human language is exactly this. It is the result of the interaction of billions of people over thousands of years. Each word may have a multitude of stories that created it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.