Would you still be interested in tech X if no one else thought it mattered? Why?
-
-
Show this thread
-
This applies to subfields of deep learning research (among other things)
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Very few people if any are aware of their own groupthink.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There's a curious difficulty here. In the early days of understanding, you need to take a lot of things on faith and defer to others, in order to bootstrap your own understanding.
-
But as you build that understanding up, you gradually start to arrive at a point where you've internalized much of the best prior points of view.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Absolutely! It does take hard work to learn stuff though. Groupthink makes it possible hide behind 'nobody was ever fired for buying ...' type of mantra
-
It's hard to comprehend why (some) people just don't want to think for themselves. Together with good health and time, it's a priceless wealth.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Cranks aside, reading about an entirely new viewpoint/approach on some existing problem is always worthwhile. Sidestep existing dead ends.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You should look in the mirror. Your blind acceptance of Darwinian evolution and materialism is 100% groupthink, a religion of nerds. This is why you people have 0 chance of figuring AGI. Zilch. It does not matter how intelligent you think you are. AGI will surprise all of you.
-
The groupthink of mainstream AI is the reason that they have not come up with anything better than backprop in decades. And,
@DeepMindAI and@demishassabis notwithstanding, most of us know that backprop has nothing to do with AGI. Never did.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.