You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
You observe the species as a whole -- it can also be modeled as a system that takes in C & O and outputs CO2. Something strikes you: the species outputs orders of magnitude more CO2 than the sum of the individuals could. It seems to collectively organize to amplify its function.
You hypothesize that the high-entropy behavior displayed by the individuals is somehow connected to this collective function-amplification phenomenon. The mystery deepens
You shrug, and go back to turning everything into paperclips?
It may deepen, but it’s also solved.
Thus you understand all there is to understand about this bizarre life form. Then you realize the same would be true for you. You evaporate into a cloud of existential bemoanment
The hypothesis is tested using a model constrained with O2 & C (+ lot N & P) inputs, with output of CO2 and waste. The objective function is biomass. The model solution shows that the organism grew exponentially, then reaches a plateau due to resource depletion and dies slowly.
Or the organism adapts, develop communication, and common strategies to efficiently consume nutrients and goes on a second exponential. Then, adapt again and spreads in new geographical area. The organism then spreaded in the universe to pursue it's objective function: growth.
So the species as a whole is more efficient via interactions than without the interactions. Bi(non) linear relationships among individuals and the environment?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
