...bots are used to dilute accounts that are anti-PC...
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh never mind, it's a Samsung.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you think this has anything to do with the necessity for the social networks to show that they have a certain number of users/quarter?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If financial impact is hard to measure, investors/govt/users don’t care then it’s easy see how it happens
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This conversation gets rehashed every so often. The short answer is that it's the user growth metrics that are keeping Twitter alive.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's only baffling if you think they care about their users vs their usage statistics (numbers they show their investors. $$$).
-
What they don't seem to care enough about is the long-term impact on human users wanting to continue using their platform when solvable problems go unsolved.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Incentives rather than competence seem like the gating factor in this particular case.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's not a technology issue, it's a business issue. Click-fraud hurts the bottom line; bot accounts help it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Cost of false positive is very different.
-
When Google Search thinks you're a bot, it asks you to solve a Captcha (only once) before you can use the service. The handling of false positives is a completely solved problem, with negligible cost.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.