Innovation is an accretion process, where long-term, large-scale macro trends matter more than individual contributions. A consequence of this is that technological revolutions are predictable shortly before they happen, if you're listening carefully.
-
-
Sometimes true sometimes not. Definitely true related to quantum computing at the moment
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i see it even within research teams (including at
@xdotai), where various people will be close to arriving at the same solution or idea ...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or it’s Jungian synchronicity
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Here it comes. Get your blockchain, solar roof, and Ai training gym ready because change is not slowing down or consolidating.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I guess innovation is just an incremental process where everyone is building upon others. Current "acceleration" may just be the result of better access to the work of other.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But it's independent contributions that make things happen, in the end. Can't wait for "law of accelerating returns" to build technology for you. Pretty sure I've seen you building tech!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Meh. Lots of groups work on things that won't pan out too. I'm not quite hearing it yet.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.