There is no way we have enough information to make this claim, or its negative. (And since solving thousands of vertical tasks is very useful indeed, that's what most researchers should focus on)https://twitter.com/fchollet/status/945581226424983554 …
-
Reread his claim. You haven't addressed it
Re-read the tweet and think about it for a while. It's not a far-fetched claim, it's almost a tautology, and could be generalized to almost any technology. I know you're a Singularity believer though, so I won't try to convince you
-
-
Superhuman strength for lots of specialized moves via steam power does not equal machines with the motor capabilities of a human body. Lots of specialized algorithms (which have been around for a long time) does not equal humanlike intelligence.
-
I agree with that, but that's a very different claim. First, we can and should aim to solve many vertical problems with a small number of general approaches, not with lots of specialized algorithms.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'm not sure why you think I'm a Singularity believer. I just said in my tweet that the negative of your claim can't be known to be true.
-
Just based on some of your previous tweets. Or am I wrong?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Singularity believer? Woah...no hitting below the belt sir...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.