Note to self: never state anything categorically, even if you don't think it matters, because those who have tied their identities to the opposite view will react very strongly
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why I believe that maybe an intelligence explosion is somewhat unlikely, though not completely impossible, I think
-
Intelligence explosion: possible in principle, but as implausible as a broken egg becoming unbroken?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I thoroughly enjoy reading your article, liking the human brain in octopus analogy. :) Yet, once you compare
#AI with books or civilizations (externalised intelligence?), I think it goes against your ‘intelligence is situational’ argument. Or, did I miss something?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Either way it's good that it promotes discussion
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Unfortunately, the most assertive, provocative and self-contradictory you are, the more you assert despite contrary evidence, the most respected you could be :( Just see Donald Trump or Laurent Alexandre...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
'The POST' about the impossibility of intelligence explosion! You should seriously read it if you haven't yet. Btw, by post he means his Medium article.
- Show replies
-
-
-
so controversial... you might have to move back to SF I think
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe you should write a follow-up post and engage with the criticism that was brought up? (e.g., in the discussion on https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15788807 … )
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.