If you post an argument online, and the only opposition you get is braindead arguments and insults, does it confirm you were right? Or is it just self-selection of those who argue online?
Show this thread
At least I think it means you didn't miss anything obvious.
-
-
(Assuming this is about intelligence explosion) You wrote a well reasoned argument (which I much appreciate being on the other side of the debate) that deserves a well reasoned reply. I would not expect the good counter arguments to appear in Twitter time.
-
Here is a start https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3553
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Obvious the bottomless pit does exist.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good feedback takes time to write! Maybe you should wait before making conclusions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think it’s an indication that you’ve gotten yourself involved in a highly polarized matter, and the people who insult stand on the opposite side, while the reason for insults could be that there’s no room for rational and logical debating as the matter has belief-based factors
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sometimes I see so many things wrong with a claim that they're not worth enumerating, but I can't just quietly close the window after wasting so many cycles on dissecting the argument.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.