If you assume energy consumption at current human levels, and a growth rate of ~3% per year (current), it would take ~2,500 years for us to consume all of the stars in the galaxy
-
-
Show this thread
-
So a single civilization going exponential anywhere in the galaxy at least 2,500 years ago would have consumed our sun by now
Show this thread -
Even taking into account the speed of light as a hard limit on expansion, it would still only take on the order of 100k years -- less than the age of humanity
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"The surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that it has never tried to contact us." Quote from Bill Watterson ;-)
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The Fermi Paradox is a thought experiment along these lines. I don’t think it even requires exponential expansion, linear is just fine over astronomical time scales. “Where is everyone?”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think this really just means you should take this as saying civilizations just cannot sustain exponential growth
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I always assume that civilizations expand in a locally Gaussian behavior. They curve up and the fall down, sometimes in multiple dimensions. So even a linear growth would assume too much sustained progress for my model.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why would this hyper-advanced civilization care about humans or interact with them in any way?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe aliens are navel-gazing (focused on living in simulations because the real world is just too simple for them).
-
Just as *we* are navel-gazing! (Probably all civilisations are, alas. --- Then get to point where space exploration becomes possible. Then terminate themselves before it succeeds. Joy.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
