Seems a lot rarer for a robotics or AI startup to achieve real-world traction of its tech/products, than to achieve a large acquisition
Show this thread
-
Corollary: robotics & AI acquisitions are rarely useful to the acquirer other than as a source of talent to redirect on core projects
Show this thread
Rephrased: there's often a large gap between teams that can develop cutting-edge tech, and teams that can develop compelling products
-
-
There are teams able to do both. The former first, the latter after enough learning. Specially with new tech
-
robovision.ai
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The world is still trying to find the right place and the right extent for robotics applications. This is a process.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What's your opinion about Magos? Looks like they're trying to bridge the gap
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
True, but also: the big tech corps can't rely on 3rd parties for their tech stack, so they won't be customers of an independent AI startup.
-
For very specialized domains, google and co buy software. They have tall orders though.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's interesting when you sell shovels. That leads to finding "use cases". Horizontal companies always run in to this. Most fail.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.