Seems a lot rarer for a robotics or AI startup to achieve real-world traction of its tech/products, than to achieve a large acquisition
Show this thread
Corollary: robotics & AI acquisitions are rarely useful to the acquirer other than as a source of talent to redirect on core projects
-
-
Rephrased: there's often a large gap between teams that can develop cutting-edge tech, and teams that can develop compelling products
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Most hiring committees are pretty bad at picking talent, or the process in general, that's why those acquisitions tend to sound safer, chpr
-
There's only one hard problem in tech: hiring : )
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
That’s not a reflection on robotics/AI. Aquirers need better vision on how to tailor these technologies to market or create a market w them
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Again this doesn’t have anything to do with the teams. This goes to the business vision of acquirers. The teams can still deliver products.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.