Arguably, 4 fps is the upper bound of the resolution you'd need to achieve full artistic control. For most scenes, 0.5 fps may suffice
Show this thread
I can imagine that in the future deep learning may allow us to create animated movies by only drawing 4 frames per second, filling the rest
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Totally agree but why particularly 4?
-
New conversation -
-
-
Are you saying Hanna-Barbera isn't animated?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Less and less of our animation is ‘hand-drawn’ today making these ‘tweening’ gains somewhat irrelevant, no?
-
Animations today is largely setting key model poses and letting the software do the rest via animation curves and constraints/expressions.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
why frames? why not simply animating the script?
-
At least one startup does this
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I bet inventing inbetweens is a lot further off than turning rough drawings into finished drawings given enough examples in the same style
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even if you could do it Artistic expression by default Does not scale Means of Production, in this case Flatten expression
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.