People who think practicing 10,000 hrs will turn you into a champion are likely the same who think more data & layers will turn DL into AGI
Show this thread
In intellectual & creative fields such as science & art, practice, while important, is definitely a secondary factor
-
-
What would you argues is the primary factor?
-
argue*
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Whatever main factor you have in mind, IMO it matters only after enough practice, so you don’t really know when you start the journey do you
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The primary factor being 'innate ability'? Not sure I agree, especially for the sciences. Anyone can do good science!
-
how about this analogy? you cannot make a middle aged man compete in the Olympics irrespective of the amount of money and training hours.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
possibly true, but don't expect ppl to agree. No one likes believing their dreams are driven by factors they don't control.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm curious, what's the primary, inspiration?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Unless you specify what kind of practice you mean, this is not even wrong.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To become the very best in a field, 10k hours practice is necessary but insufficient. Superior talent is *also* necessary but insufficient.
-
… but this just speaks to becoming the VERY BEST. If you only want to get REALLY GOOD, you can fudge on the "talent" side of things.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.