It's the results you get that make your algorithm interesting, not how elegant your theory is or how much time you spent developing it
Show this thread
-
It's rare that an algorithm with only empirical justification has any longevity, unless it's simultaneously simple or elegant.
And what justification other than empirical justification is there? Im talking about science, not philosophy
-
-
A method that performs poorly can be a stepping stone to novel research avenues if theory is sound. Unmotivated success stories are deadends
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.