The mind is an engine for producing behavior. Intelligence cannot be understood outside of its sensorimotor context.
-
-
that's harsh! I have to say I'm amazed by this veracity of yours, fighting AI hype, when your employer is so much invested in it (the hype).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
maybe we should drop "learning" from ML, altogether. There must be a more meaningful alternative word conveying what it is ML actually does.
-
Many years ago I heard ML people in Toronto say that a ML method had "learned the distribution" (of a posterior), then it made sense to me
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
yes, but behavior is dependent on the evaluation of circumstances in relation to goals, no? potentially fully internal with abstract data
-
You were once a single cell. It "behaved" to produce an organism with its circuits etc. Functional competence =/= ability to reflect on it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I switched all my references from AI to ML in my writing & felt a huge weight lift off my shoulders in dealing with inflated expectations
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Generally picking a subpart of cognition and saying 'there, that's the intelligent bit' hasn't gone well. Intelligence is multifaceted.
-
Even if you specialize in studying a particular facet, that's no reason to say you aren't studying intelligence.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The non-learning aspect of AI is important. Some behavioral traits observed in organisms are passed on, rather than learned in its lifetime.
-
= Initial parameters?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.