"Fake news" wasn't supposed to be "false news" or "reporting that upsets me". It was the likes of http://breaking.abcnewscom.co . Literal fake news
I'm old enough to remember when "fake news" were literally made-up news outlets peddling fictional articles, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fake_news_website#Prominent_sources …
-
-
-
As such, fake news is as easy to filter out automatically as junk emails that sell viagra. It doesn't require verifying reporting accuracy.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Also remember when Wikipedia was considered "fake news" http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4530930.stm …
-
Wikipedia has always been Wikipedia. It isn't a newspaper and it isn't pretending to be one.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.