Aren't humans still vastly better at doing pattern recognition on a game board, given a human-size training dataset?
-
-
-
Agree re: human size training dataset & computation restrictions. Depending on underlying task, that's either v important or not at all.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I don't consider training on millions of games to be unfair, as long as it doesn't memorize those games. DTS is questionable-ish.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The problem is that we "rush" to get a result, AI training should be much wider than just that one problem we want to solve.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You could just end up calling whatever makes them better an "advantage"..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Isn't that the modus operandi of every champion?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We do it this way because is the easy way
@BenedictEvans we should use that advantage to build better AI Be better teachers, with AI alsoThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
AGI won't need it but sure single purpose AI that knows nothing else? You're looking at the equivalent of an severely autistic genius.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
True that human size training dataset is tiny, but only "during his lifetime", but...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
... there are instead millions of years of evolution which have shaped this brain so that it quickly learns and adapts to its environment.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.