In ML, where algorithms get published quickly and state-of-the-art frameworks are open-source, there isn't any first-mover advantage
-
-
Which tends to benefit established large companies, rather than nimble upstarts with better tech
-
But also there are so many verticals established companies can't go deep enough into, and that's the opportunity for nimble upstarts.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Absolutely. Checkout my predictions on AI from 2 years ago.https://mobile.twitter.com/ChikaObuah/status/664127720788488192 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Agreed. Like ML, any other example in history when infrastructure know-how n data accumulation was advantage?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also domain expertise matters (asking the right questions is a lot harder especially in large companies)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is the scary part actually. This is what AI Doomsday headlines should be made of. The community should work towards democratising data.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
in that case, why even bother with improving on algorithms?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also: applying to new problems. Eg we boosted cf recos with image features, can do because we have visual product. No cutting edge research
-
Ok, maybe that was cutting edge two years ago. But point is there are lots of venues to find creative solutions if you are not GOOG/FB/TSLA
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
True, as long as the established company masters both (data accumulation and infrastructure know how) . I'd add rapid iteration to the mixpic.twitter.com/LgUjPsGzgG
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.