Machines built upon nanotechnology of a kind that is far more advanced than anything we can achieve In Silico today.
-
-
-
Of course, the short answer is no -- there would be rather limited potential for recursive self-improvement, much like with human-level AGI.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The editing of DNA is the easy part. Delivering it to every somatic cell in the human body without side effects isn't.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Intelligence is an attractive quality that biases reproductive selection, so yeah. There is a recursive improvement there.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes? Obviously at a slow pace and somewhat limited results (DNA is still just 4 editing meatbags).Can be sped up: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/535661/engineering-the-perfect-baby/ …
-
I should say it would only be "recursive" if the gain we get from imprvmnt. leads to a greater gain in the next generation.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hope so
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We already are. We would just become more efficient at it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can we edit simpler somatic stuff first? Edit out some diseases? We barely undertand how brain works, let alone how intllgnce is DNA encoded
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
DNA code is a very unstable balance for human physiology. Improve one function, break two. Global minimum takes millions of years to find.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.